<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Explorations in New Media - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-7f390f5e" type="application/json"/><link>http://explorationsinnewmedia.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://explorationsinnewmedia.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:07:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the best way to measure traffic online?</title><link>http://explorations.community-journalism.net/2010/04/09/how-to-measure-news-site-traffic/#comment-313483077</link><description>Great post, Andrew. I will use it in my class on the changing news industry at Stony Brook University.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barbara Selvin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:07:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What&amp;#8217;s the best way to measure traffic online?</title><link>http://explorations.community-journalism.net/2010/04/09/how-to-measure-news-site-traffic/#comment-44113256</link><description>As someone who works on the business side of an online news site, I caution against emphasis on pageviews. This metric is easily manipulated by changing the user interface of the site. Take photo galleries for example, you can implement a "click for next photo" that will generate a ton of pageviews. Or use a javascript photo browser (where the photos automatically change) to get the same effect with only one pageview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bottom line is that pageviews are heavily influenced by website design and do not accurately represent reader patterns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From a business perspective, frequency is a far more valuable metric. As an advertiser I want to know how many times my ad is shown to each person, not how many times in total is was displayed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joeboydston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:53:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why can&amp;#8217;t news organizations monetize traffic spikes?</title><link>http://explorations.community-journalism.net/2010/04/02/why-cant-news-organizations-monetize-traffic-spikes/#comment-42930728</link><description>In my opinion the primary reason online ad rates are low is that they are not effective. Users don't click on the ads, no brainer right? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I describe briefly on my blog, we have found that marketing strategies that focus on increasing frequency will yield MUCH higher results. I believe that traffic driven by one time spikes in activity provide very little value to most advertisers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.joeboydston.com/blog/frequency/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.joeboydston.com/blo...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">joeboydston</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:20:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
